Notre Dame AD: 'College Athletics Is In A Crisis'

Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick believes college sports have reached a breaking point.

Swarbrick and Notre Dame president John Jenkins wrote a joint op-ed in The New York Times arguing that college sports has officially entered a state of crisis.

One of the main issues he sees is NIL, and he wants something done about it.

Swarbrick and Jenkins wrote the following in part:


The nation is now immersed in the thrill of the N.C.A.A. basketball tournament. (Our women’s team plays Maryland on Saturday.) But beyond the excitement, college athletics is in crisis.
It faces threats on a number of fronts: the growing patchwork of contradictory and confusing state laws regulating it, the specter of crippling lawsuits, the profusion of dubious name, image and likeness deals through which to funnel money to recruits, the misguided attempts to classify student-athletes as employees. Underlying all that is the widespread belief that college athletics is simply a lucrative business disguised as a branch of educational institutions.

Notre Dame AD Jack Swarbrick is drawing a line in the sand.

Swarbrick also spoke with Sports Illustrated about the issues he sees, and he only doubled down.

"If we can’t start to get ourselves to where we can make rational decisions like those and enforce them, the future will be more than one athletic association. I can tell you that," the Notre Dame AD explained.

He further pressed college leaders to act and added, "We’ve got to get our act together as college athletics and do the things we can do. We keep sort of implying we can’t address name, image and likeness. Of course we can. We can do it in ways requiring reporting on transactions, requiring that there be transactions. We have to take that on as opposed to looking to others to fix it for us."

Is there actually a crisis?

Is Jack Swarbrick right or is he perhaps jumping the gun a little bit? It all depends on perspective. From the point of view of athletes, this is the greatest time in the history of college sports to be an athlete.

For generations, college athletes were banned from profiting. It was strictly prohibited. Some star athletes took money under the table, but doing so could result in lengthy suspensions or bans.

Now, they can make as much cash as the market (cough *boosters* cough) dictate. If you're an athlete, it's a great time. Even someone like Olivia Dunne can cash in, despite nobody really caring about gymnastics. She has a following on social media and prints cash.

On the other hand, if you're an administrator, coach or official, it's hard to argue this is a great time. Players have freedom of movement, and if they can get a bag elsewhere, they might just go take it. It's a new era. Change is never easy, and judging from Swarbrick's comments, he's not enjoying it.

However, it's unlikely to change. The NCAA is as weak as it's ever been and it's only getting weaker. The NIL era is here to stay. Could there be tweaks? Sure, but now that players have money, it will never be taken away.