in

ESPN Subscribers Down About 6 Percent Year-Over-Year

ESPN’s parent call announced its quarterly earnings on Tuesday, and a topic of conversation always interesting to sports media observers on these dates is how ESPN is doing with subscribers, which have been on a downward trend for the past five years.

Adding up some numbers shared by Disney CFO Christine McCarthy on the earnings call, ESPN is down in subscribers about 6 percent year-over-year. “Total Media Networks affiliate revenue increased 2%,” McCarthy said. “This was driven by seven points of growth from higher rates, offset by a four-point decline due to a decrease in subscribers, which benefited by about two points due to the launch of the ACC Network.”

While it’s a good thing for ESPN that they are raising their affiliate revenue faster than the rate at which they are losing subs, LightShed analyst Rich Greenfield (who is a years-long ESPN/Disney antagonist) shared a chart in which he declared that the cord-cutting is accelerating:

AT&T/DirecTV Problem

The industry does have a structural cord-cutting issue, but it warrants mentioning in this space that AT&T/DirecTV have a far bigger problem in this category than the rest of their competitors. They lost about a million subscribers this past quarter, and have lost about seven million subscribers — over a quarter of their base — in the last two years due to high costs and bad customer service. Comcast is “only” losing TV subscribers about half as fast. Dish isn’t losing them nearly as fast as AT&T/DirecTV either. Neither is Charter, which actually reversed industry trends and gained a modest amount of subscribers this past quarter.

To the extent the cable/satellite bundle is surviving, it’s being held together almost entirely by live sports and live news. It’s a tricky spot for Disney/ESPN and the whole industry. Cable/satellite bundles are becoming less popular, as the television marketplace fragments with direct-to-consumer streaming services like Netflix gain steam.

Why It Affects ESPN the Most

This trend affects everyone who carries live sports rights, not just ESPN, but ESPN loses the most from it because they have substantially higher affiliate fees than FS1, NBCSN, and CBS Sports Network. As of 2017, ESPN and its other networks were getting more than $9 per month for each subscriber, and that number has risen in the last several years.

Direct-to-Consumer Future?

To be sure, Disney has already begun to pivot to the direct-to-consumer marketplace. Disney+ which now has 57.5 million subscribers. ESPN+ has 8.5 million subscribers. The company also has a majority stake in Hulu, which has over 35 million subscribers.

On Disney’s earnings call Tuesday, an analyst asked if they would consider making ESPN a direct-to-consumer product.

“Let me first start off by saying that, on a macro level, you know, I think we understand the value of live sports,” answered Disney CEO Bob Chapek. “ESPN is the strongest brand in sports, and sports continue to be a driver of viewing interest. I think it’s evidenced by the fact that sports accounted for over 90 of the 100 most-viewed telecast on broadcast and cable in 2019. So, we’ve got a really strong position from a brand standpoint in a market that consumers love.”

“So, then the question is, how do we get it to the consumer?” Chapek continued. “And certainly, you asked if whether we’ve looked at a stronger direct-to-consumer proposition for ESPN. Absolutely. We’ve looked at everything. And when we think that we’ve got the most effective way to maximize shareholder value from the brand, the way we are right now. But as that changes over time, we’re certainly open to any and all options in terms of how we may be able to get our programs out to our consumers. And hopefully, we can talk a little bit more about this in our investor conference when we meet in the next few months.”

If ESPN — and everyone else — knew what the bottom of the cable/satellite bundle would be, they could adjust accordingly as far as what to put on their cable networks, what to put on the broadcast network ABC, and what to put on ESPN+.

It will be fascinating to see how they will continue to adjust, because if they were to take their whole package direct-to-consumer as opposed to keeping it in a bundle it could ultimately wind up tripling or quadrupling costs for die-hard sports fans.

Written by Ryan Glasspiegel

Ryan Glasspiegel grew up in Connecticut, graduated from University of Wisconsin-Madison, and lives in Chicago. Before OutKick, he wrote for Sports Illustrated and The Big Lead. He enjoys expensive bourbon and cheap beer.

2 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. In my opinion, Directv was the best. I don’t think anyone came close. Then AT&T bought them out and customer service fell apart. I just don’t get how you spend billions to purchase a company and then do everything in your power to fuck up all of the reasons why you purchased it in the first place. ESPN basically had a monopoly on sports. Nobody did it better. Then, they decided they liked the CNN/MSNBC model and replicated it. Replicating CNN equals bad ratings and bad television. ESPN sucks. That’s why I love Outkick. Reasonable, common sense. No bull-shit. Almost like a less-is-more model. Keep it simple. Anyone watch MTV anymore? Exactly…

Leave a Reply

to comment on this post. Not a VIP? Signup Here
Tucker Poolman

NHL’s Tucker Poolman Takes Puck To The Face, Suffers Serious Leakage

Beirut After The Blast: The Destruction Is Catastrophic